Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drought-hardened barley did not alter O2˙− accumulation during cadmium cross-adaptation.

A claim from The role of oxidative stress in spring barley cross-adaptation to different heavy metals · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-hardened barley did not alter O2˙− accumulation during cadmium cross-adaptation.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
drought hardeninge4
Outcome
O2˙− accumulatione6
Direction
did not alterede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“did not altered O2˙− accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1015
e4

“Cross-adaptation to cadmium (Cd) was induced only by drought hardening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–903
e0

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–114

Title

The role of oxidative stress in spring barley cross-adaptation to different heavy metals

Giedrė Kacienė; Romualdas Juknys; Irena Januškaitienė Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2016. doi:10.1080/03650340.2016.1256474

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e0ba5de115ba7e191129119156ab035814baf1257d4ab458b0f88523ba8ac185 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

in vitro · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 12 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.