Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cut irrigation reduced spike length of wheat by 10.30.

A claim from NTERACTIVE EFFECT OF MOISTURE STRESS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER LEVEL ON SOME YIELD OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cut irrigation reduced spike length of wheat by 10.30.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cut irrigatione2
Outcome
spike lengthe2
Direction
reductione2
Value
10.30e2
Comparator
continue irrigation without cuttinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cut irrigation caused reduction of number of spike at branching stage, shoot, and spike length, number of grains at flowering stage which reached 29.19, 49.51, 10.30 and 34.11%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1165
e3

“in addition to the continue irrigation without cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–657
t0

“NTERACTIVE EFFECT OF MOISTURE STRESS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER LEVEL ON SOME YIELD OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

NTERACTIVE EFFECT OF MOISTURE STRESS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER LEVEL ON SOME YIELD OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

Deia A. Mohammed; Noor Salam Lateef Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal 2020. doi:10.52951/dasj.20121031

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e0d17babcfb924077fd2685974dd56a628fb9b53419227766ef6d3c16cdd149f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.