Intervention effectmodel-written summary

These herbicides controlled 52–88% of broad leaf weeds.

A claim from Evaluation of new herbicides against mixed weed flora in wheat. · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicides controlled 52–88% of broad leaf weeds.

Treatment
Above herbicidese0
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
control of broad leaf weedse0
Value
52–88%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above herbicides gave 52–88% control of broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–410
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62
e1

“Above herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–370

Title

Evaluation of new herbicides against mixed weed flora in wheat.

R. S. Balyan Indian Journal of Weed Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e11b1ea4374328545770867797886b030f36a12e2766295285067988d2e39cfe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
    Wheat weed control was lower with residue retention without herbicides than with herbicide.

    Influence of Straw Management on Phalaris minor Retz. Control · 2009 · compared with herbicide application (sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha+metsulfuron 3 g/ha)

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

392 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.