Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruning 9–23 May while retaining six buds maximized fruit size and weight.

A claim from Influence of pruning severity and time on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning 9–23 May while retaining six buds maximized fruit size and weight.

Treatment
pruned between 9 and 23 May by retaining 6 budse0
Outcome
fruit size and weighte0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum fruit size and weight were recorded in trees pruned between 9 and 23 May by retaining 6 buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–697
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–72

Title

Influence of pruning severity and time on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran

K. S. Gill; J. S. Bal Indian Journal of Horticulture 2006

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e12d08f0201c5480b2e25e4d93214c2efdada894e8871a21cb34e204615e47ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.