Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage gave the highest straw yield of wheat, 5370.7 kg/ha.

A claim from Optimising wheat yield and water use efficiency through strategic irrigation scheduling and zinc biofortification · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage gave the highest straw yield of wheat, 5370.7 kg/ha.

Treatment
Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stagee2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
5370.7 kg/hae2
Setting
Pusa, Bihare1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317
e1

“A field investigation was executed at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–421
e2

“Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics and attained highest grain yield of 3812.6 kg/ha and straw yield of 5370.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–892

Title

Optimising wheat yield and water use efficiency through strategic irrigation scheduling and zinc biofortification

Naaz Shagufta; Kumar Rajan; Dharminder; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13360

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e13bfbe853d02ad3bdc46dc3dd1a204eb8f39acf9959f63fb963a9c2e71ea7b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.