Paper · 2026 · Plant Science Today

Optimising wheat yield and water use efficiency through strategic irrigation scheduling and zinc biofortification

Naaz Shagufta; Kumar Rajan; Dharminder; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Global wheat production faces dual challenges of water scarcity and micronutrient deficiencies, necessitating sustainable intensification strategies. This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality. A field investigation was executed at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar during the winter season of 2023–24 under 3 levels of irrigation, viz. irrigation at crown root initiation (CRI), CRI + booting stage and CRI + booting + milking stage and 4 levels of Zn management, viz. control, 2.5 kg, 5.0 kg Zn/ha (basal) and two foliar spray of ZnSO4. Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics and attained highest grain yield of 3812.6 kg/ha and straw yield of 5370.7 kg/ha. Maximum protein content (9.85 %) was observed when irrigated 3 times (CRI + booting + milking stage). However, water use efficiency and water productivity were significantly highest at irrigation scheduling at the CRI stage. Basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced the grain yield by 23.1 % as compared to control (no Zn). Therefore, irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage coupled with basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced wheat productivity by improving water use and nutrient uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics of wheat.

Treatment
Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stagee2
Outcome
yield attributing characteristicse2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Setting
Pusa, Bihare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field investigation was executed at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics and attained highest grain yield of 3812.6 kg/ha and straw yield of 5370.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage gave the highest grain yield of wheat, 3812.6 kg/ha.

Treatment
Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stagee2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3812.6 kg/hae2
Setting
Pusa, Bihare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field investigation was executed at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics and attained highest grain yield of 3812.6 kg/ha and straw yield of 5370.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage gave the highest straw yield of wheat, 5370.7 kg/ha.

Treatment
Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stagee2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
5370.7 kg/hae2
Setting
Pusa, Bihare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field investigation was executed at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage significantly increased the yield attributing characteristics and attained highest grain yield of 3812.6 kg/ha and straw yield of 5370.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced wheat grain yield by 23.1 % compared with the control without Zn.

Treatment
Basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/hae5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
23.1 %e5
Comparator
control (no Zn)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e5

“Basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced the grain yield by 23.1 % as compared to control (no Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation three times (CRI + booting + milking stage) gave the maximum wheat protein content, 9.85 %.

Treatment
irrigated 3 times (CRI + booting + milking stage)e3
Outcome
protein contente3
Direction
Maximume3
Value
9.85 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum protein content (9.85 %) was observed when irrigated 3 times (CRI + booting + milking stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency and water productivity of wheat were highest with irrigation scheduling at the CRI stage.

Treatment
irrigation scheduling at the CRI stagee4
Outcome
water use efficiency and water productivitye4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, water use efficiency and water productivity were significantly highest at irrigation scheduling at the CRI stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at CRI + booting + milking stage with basal 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced wheat productivity by improving water use and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage coupled with basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/hae6
Outcome
wheat productivitye6
Direction
enhancede6
Qualifier
by improving water use and nutrient uptakee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigates the synergistic effects of optimised irrigation scheduling and zinc (Zn) biofortification on wheat growth, productivity and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–317 · show in text ↑
e6

“Therefore, irrigation scheduling at CRI + booting + milking stage coupled with basal application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha enhanced wheat productivity by improving water use and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1403 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

crown compound · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.