Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar RDF with 2% DAP and multimicronutrient at 50% flowering gave higher straw yield of 4100 kg/ha in pigeonpea.

A claim from Study of foliar nutrient management on growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar RDF with 2% DAP and multimicronutrient at 50% flowering gave higher straw yield of 4100 kg/ha in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
BDN-716e2
Treatment
RDF + (2% DAP and Multimicronutrient @ 2ml/litre foliar spray) at 50% floweringe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4100 kg/hae0
Qualifier
followed by RDF + 2% urea + Multimicronutrient spray @ 2ml/litree0
Setting
Agriculture Research Station, Badnapur (Maharashtra)e1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that application of RDF + (2% DAP and Multimicronutrient @ 2ml/litre foliar spray) at 50% flowering of pigeonpea produced maximum plant height (150 cm), branches (14.33), no of functional leaves (96.67), dry matter accumulation (143.33), no of pods (73.67), weight of pods /plant(52.67 g), seed yield/plant (38.67 kg/ha), 100 seed weight (14 g), as well as maximum seed yield (1650 kg/ha), straw yield (4100 kg/ha), biological yield (5750 kg/ha), harvest index(28.69), maximum net returns (57199 kg/ha) and B:C ratio(3.10) followed by RDF + 2% urea + Multimicronutrient spray @ 2ml/litre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–1103
e1

“was conducted at Agriculture Research Station, Badnapur (Maharashtra)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–159
e2

“the variety was BDN-716”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–497

Title

Study of foliar nutrient management on growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

Elumle Priyanka; Shrirame; Darade Ga Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e1783559d8d9dd057171926689ec3e7de0f10904a3ea3dc7d03bd080c76cabab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.