Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Without compaction, frequent light irrigation gave higher grain yields than infrequent heavy irrigation.

A claim from Comparison of Banded and Broadcast Fertilizer Applications in Relation to Compaction and Irrigation in Maize and Wheat · 1974

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without compaction, frequent light irrigation gave higher grain yields than infrequent heavy irrigation.

Taxon
Maize and WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
frequent light irrigationse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
infrequent heavy irrigationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields were higher with frequent light irrigations than with infrequent heavy irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1669
t0

“Maize and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–118

Title

Comparison of Banded and Broadcast Fertilizer Applications in Relation to Compaction and Irrigation in Maize and Wheat

M. R. Chaudhary; S. S. Prihar Agronomy Journal 1974. doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600040024x

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e1b70404fb0f721c4604fd8fcdc130234eb9c785ffda0f9f9c792413bea2b738 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

light · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 17 positive, 31 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.