Claim · model-written summary
Diclosulam did not affect peanut injury from imazapic.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- diclosulame0
- Outcome
- peanut injury from imazapice0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although diclosulam did not affect peanut injury from imazapic, injury increased when imazapic was applied with flumioxazin”
Title
Tolerance of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Herbicides Applied Postemergence
David L. Jordan; Janet F. Spears; John W. Wilcut Peanut Science 2003. doi:10.3146/pnut.30.1.0002
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Flumioxazin alone or with acifluorfen plus bentazon injured peanut more than the named alternative herbicides.
- Intervention effect Flumioxazin reduced peanut pod yield by 620 kg/ha compared with untreated peanut.
- Intervention effect Acifluorfen plus bentazon reduced peanut yield by 200 kg/ha versus untreated peanut.
- Intervention effect Acifluorfen plus bentazon plus 2,4-DB reduced peanut yield by 150 kg/ha versus untreated peanut.
- Intervention effect Flumioxazin plus paraquat and bentazon injured peanut more than the named alternatives with paraquat and bentazon.
- Intervention effect Adding diclosulam to paraquat plus bentazon did not change peanut injury.
- Intervention effect Dimethenamid increased peanut injury with paraquat plus bentazon.
- Intervention effect Metolachlor increased peanut injury with paraquat plus bentazon.
- Intervention effect Adding flumioxazin to imazapic increased peanut injury.
- Intervention effect Across nine sites, 2,4-DB applied at the three intervals before inversion did not adversely affect pod yield, gross economic value or seed germination.