Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Influence of Sulfentrazone Rate and Application Method on Peanut Weed Control

Timothy L. Grey; David C. Bridges; H. Gary Hancock; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut early-season injury from sulfentrazone PPI or PRE ranged from 0 to 10%.

Treatment
sulfentrazone PPI or PREe1
Outcome
early-season injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
0 to 10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic caused 10% early-season injury to peanut.

Treatment
imazapice1
Outcome
early-season injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin caused 3 to 23% early-season injury to peanut.

Treatment
flumioxazine1
Outcome
early-season injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
3 to 23%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclosulam caused 1 to 7% early-season injury to peanut.

Treatment
diclosulame1
Outcome
early-season injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
1 to 7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of peanut treated with sulfentrazone PPI were similar to those of other herbicide treatments.

Treatment
sulfentrazone PPIe2
Outcome
Yieldse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfentrazone PRE or PPI gave 83% or greater yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
sulfentrazone PRE or PPIe3
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee3weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedge controle3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
83% or greatere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclosulam gave 83 and 90% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
diclosulame4
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee3weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedge controle3
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
83 and 90%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–822 · show in text ↑
e4

“83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic gave 96 and 99% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
imazapice4
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee3weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedge controle3
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
96 and 99%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–822 · show in text ↑
e4

“83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia.

Treatment
Flumioxazine4
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee4weed
Second interactor
wild poinsettiae4weed
Outcome
controle4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE gave 82% or greater tall morningglory control at 168 g/ha or higher.

Treatment
imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PREe5
Interactor
Tall morningglorye5weed
Outcome
Tall morningglory controle5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
82% or greatere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclosulam, flumioxazin and sulfentrazone PRE gave 88% or greater Florida beggarweed control at 224 and 280 g/ha.

Treatment
diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PREe6
Interactor
Florida beggarweedDesmodium tortuosume6weed
Outcome
Florida beggarweed controle6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
88% or greatere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Desmodium tortuosum
Desmodium tortuosum · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e6

“Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high.

Treatment
sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PREe7
Outcome
tolerancee7
Direction
highe7
Comparator
the currently registered peanut residual herbicidese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield with sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was equivalent to registered residual herbicides.

Treatment
sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PREe7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
the currently registered peanut residual herbicidese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to determine peanut and weed response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1378 · show in text ↑

sulfentrazone · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Diclosulam · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imazapic · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

flumioxazin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Diclosulam · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

sulfentrazone · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sulfentrazone · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.