Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased net return to Rs. 42,220/-.

A claim from Effect of nutrient management practices on growth, yield and economics of cotton crop in west central table land zone at Bargarh district of Odisha · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased net return to Rs. 42,220/-.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
Rs. 42,220/-e0
Comparator
FPe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop significantly increased the yield (14 q/ha) over FP with increasing in net return (Rs. 42,220/-) with B:C ratio (1.89) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1305
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821

Title

Effect of nutrient management practices on growth, yield and economics of cotton crop in west central table land zone at Bargarh district of Odisha

Rahul Dev Behera; NC Barik; S Sahu; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5sd.772

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e1fa7ca8935b111812f0d3bfa78ea8423b624ce5a93e6ba37d05138bd69f2dad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

magnesium sulfate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Foliar MgSO4 raised seed cotton yield by more than 18%, to 1 630 kg/ha.

    Effect of magnesium, zinc, iron and boron application on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Foliar MgSO4 plus ZnSO4 gave the highest seed cotton yield of 3421.4 kg/ha.

    Effects of foliar application of nutrients on growth and yield of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2015

    Same direction

  3. positive
    The 100% RDF plus 1% MgSO4 spray gave the highest yield.

    Effect of fertilizer levels on leaf reddening in Bt and non-Bt cotton · 2015

    Same direction

  4. positive
    The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had higher productivity efficiency (0.44 pooled).

    Productivity Efficiency and Leaf Reddening in Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Influenced by SSNM Based Nutrition for Targeted Yields · 2018

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The specified fertigation program was suitable for maximum cotton growth and yield attributes.

    Drip fertigation and crop management in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 2024

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Soil MgSO4 plus three foliar sprays of MgSO4 and KNO3 gave maximum seed cotton yield versus control.

    Effect of nutrient management practices on growth, and yield of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2014 · compared with control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The foliar nutrient sequence with RDF produced higher number of bolls per plant than other treatments (43).

    Influence of methods and stage of application of zinc, magnesium and boron on yield attributes, yield and micronutrients uptake of cotton in rainfed alfisols · 2020 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

  8. positive
    MgSO4 at a rate of 50 kg ha-1 along with 250 kg vermicompost for 30 days (1:5 ratio) gave maximum boll weight (3.9 g).

    Evaluation of the effect of magnesium in combination with organic manures on the growth and yield attributes and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) inTypic Ustropept · 2022

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Flowering-stage waterlogging had the greatest yield reduction, 38.8%.

    Effect of Waterlogging Duration at Different Growth Stages on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton · 2017

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Shade during squaring and early flowering had little effect on boll weight.

    COTTON RESPONSES TO SHADE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES: GROWTH, LINT YIELD AND FIBRE QUALITY · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    High night temperature during flowering reduced seeds per locule and seeds per boll.

    High Night Temperatures During the Floral Bud Stage Increase the Abscission of Reproductive Structures in Cotton · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stress in the latter half of flowering reduced boll retention, number and weight.

    Effects of Soil Moisture Stress on Two Varieties of Upland Cotton in Israel I. The Coastal Plain Region · 1971

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Seed cotton yield declined by 24.7% under skipped irrigation relative to normal irrigation.

    Kaolin and Jasmonic acid improved cotton productivity under water stress conditions · 2021 · compared with Normal irrigated crop

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Seed cotton production was more affected by saline water applied at the flowering and boll formation stages.

    Gas exchanges and production of colored cotton irrigated with saline water at different phenological stages · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Peak flowering water deficit reduced cotton yield more than early or late stress.

    WATER STRESS during flowering of cotton · 1970 · compared with stress periods of comparable length imposed either early or late in the flowering period

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    DU defoliant applied at 60 days after flowering reduced seed cotton yield, boll number, boll weight and lint index.

    Effect of different defoliants and application times on the yield and quality components of cotton in semi-arid conditions · 2010

    Opposite direction

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar methanol did not increase cotton yield at any location.

    Foliar Methanol Applications to Cotton in the Southeastern United States: Leaf Physiology, Growth, and Yield Components · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Fluazifop at four weeks gave cotton 93% of weed-free yield.

    Growth and Interaction of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) by Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 1991 · compared with weed-free cotton

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Peak flowering spraying somewhat reduced weight of late opening bolls.

    Cotton Flowering and Fruiting Responses to Application Timing of Chemical Growth Retardants1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers produced no significant yield response.

    Effects of foliar fertilization of texas southern high plains cotton: Leaf phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, boron, calcium, and yield distribution · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    First-harvest lint yield was generally unaffected by foliar treatments.

    Influence of surfactants on potassium uptake and yield response of cotton to foliar potassium nitrate · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers did not significantly affect lint or seed yield.

    Effects of Foliar Fertilization of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton: Leaf Nitrogen and Growth Parameters · 1998

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    A single 1 mL water spray reduced cotton seed set by 55%.

    Sprinkler‐Induced Flower Losses and Yield Reductions in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Lint yields were similar with early or early plus midseason glyphosate sprays.

    Timing of Glyphosate Application on Control of Silverleaf Nightshade and Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Yield · 2006

    Opposite direction

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.