Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of nutrient management practices on growth, yield and economics of cotton crop in west central table land zone at Bargarh district of Odisha

Rahul Dev Behera; NC Barik; S Sahu; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the farmer’s field of Bargarh district of Odisha in kharif, 2023 under the demonstration programme of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bargarh to study the “Effect of nutrient management practices on growth, yield and economics of cotton crop in west central table land zone at Bargarh district of Odisha”. The treatments were taken as Farmer’s practice (FP) on improper nutrient management and recommended practice (RP) on STBF + one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea + 1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage. Each treatment replicated for 10 times with randomized block design. The results concluded that the application of nutrient management practices (RP) as STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage gives the higher boll weight (3.41 g) with higher no of bolls/plant (22) and no of bolls/m2 (101) over the FP. The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively. The cotton crop significantly increased the yield (14 q/ha) over FP with increasing in net return (Rs. 42,220/-) with B:C ratio (1.89) respectively. The RP of nutrient management practices in cotton crop can be recommended to the farmers for better yield and income.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management produced higher boll weight of 3.41 g than farmer practice.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.41 ge0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of nutrient management practices (RP) as STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage gives the higher boll weight (3.41 g) with higher no of bolls/plant (22) and no of bolls/m2 (101) over the FP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop in west central table land zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management produced 22 bolls per plant, higher than farmer practice.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
no of bolls/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
22e0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher no of bolls/plant (22) and no of bolls/m2 (101) over the FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop in west central table land zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management produced 101 bolls per square metre, higher than farmer practice.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
no of bolls/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
101e0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher no of bolls/plant (22) and no of bolls/m2 (101) over the FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop in west central table land zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased cotton height at 30 DAS to 31.68 cm.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.68 cme0
Qualifier
30 DASe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased cotton height at 60 DAS to 56.32 cm.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56.32 cme0
Qualifier
60 DASe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased cotton height at 90 DAS to 76.39 cm.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
76.39 cme0
Qualifier
90 DASe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased cotton height at 120 DAS to 103.28 cm.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103.28 cme0
Qualifier
120 DASe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased cotton height at 150 DAS to 123.68.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
123.68e0
Qualifier
150 DASe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the cotton crop was increased by the nutrient management practices as compared to the FP at 30 DAS (31.68 cm), 60 DAS (56.32 cm), 90 DAS (76.39 cm), 120 DAS (103.28 cm) and 150 DAS (123.68) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield increased significantly to 14 q/ha over farmer practice.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14 q/hae0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop significantly increased the yield (14 q/ha) over FP with increasing in net return (Rs. 42,220/-) with B:C ratio (1.89) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1305 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management increased net return to Rs. 42,220/-.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stagee1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
Rs. 42,220/-e0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton crop significantly increased the yield (14 q/ha) over FP with increasing in net return (Rs. 42,220/-) with B:C ratio (1.89) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1305 · show in text ↑
e1

“STBF with one spray of 2% urea and one spray of 1% urea plus1% MgSo4 during flowering to boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nutrient management had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.89.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
1.89e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with B:C ratio (1.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop in west central table land zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend recommended-practice nutrient management for improved yield and income.

Taxon
cotton cropGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
RP of nutrient management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RP of nutrient management practices in cotton crop can be recommended to the farmers for better yield and income.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1423 · show in text ↑

magnesium sulfate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

magnesium sulfate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

stage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.