Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Si amendment increased the number and width of silica cells in rice leaves.

A claim from Defense Responses in Rice Induced by Silicon Amendment against Infestation by the Leaf Folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si amendment increased the number and width of silica cells in rice leaves.

Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
Si amendmente3
Outcome
number and width of silica cellse3
Direction
increasese3
Comparator
without Si amendmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Regardless of leaf folder infestation, Si amendment significantly increased leaf Si content through increases in the number and width of silica cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1354
e2

“rice plants with or without leaf folder infestation and with or without Si amendment at 0.32 g Si/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–672

Title

Defense Responses in Rice Induced by Silicon Amendment against Infestation by the Leaf Folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis

Yongqiang Han; Pei Li; Shaolong Gong; et al. PLoS ONE 2016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153918

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e253c78ef425e3546944e8089a012f4c22d97cc9bf55d25da1faa8d107084482 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 66 positive, 11 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.