Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Postemergence acifluorfen provided at least 87% waterhemp control in Cottam in 2003 and 2004 and Petrolia in 2004.

A claim from Control of herbicide-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) with pre- and post-emergence herbicides in soybean · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence acifluorfen provided at least 87% waterhemp control in Cottam in 2003 and 2004 and Petrolia in 2004.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Acifluorfene0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
waterhemp controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
87% or greatere0
Setting
Cottame0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135
e0

“Acifluorfen, fomesafen, imazamox plus fomesafen, and glyphosate applied postemergence resulted in 87% or greater waterhemp control 70 d after application at Cottam in 2003 and 2004 and at Petrolia in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1064

Title

Control of herbicide-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) with pre- and post-emergence herbicides in soybean

J. D. Vyn; C. J. Swanton; S. E. Weaver; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2007. doi:10.4141/p06-016

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e2b96f52d1f9b55a9b449131d5030b0ed7105d29a952bfbae388525173c48c0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

acifluorfen · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.