Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tillage type and nitrogen dose had no significant overall differences in wheat grain and straw yields and grain total nitrogen.

A claim from Nitrogen Use Efficiency Using the 15N Dilution Technique for Wheat Yield under Conservation Agriculture and Nitrogen Fertilizer · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage type and nitrogen dose had no significant overall differences in wheat grain and straw yields and grain total nitrogen.

Treatment
tillage types and nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
grain and straw yields and grain total nitrogene0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference between tillage types and nitrogen doses for grain and straw yields and grain total nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1024
e1

“The Louiza variety of durum wheat was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–736

Title

Nitrogen Use Efficiency Using the 15N Dilution Technique for Wheat Yield under Conservation Agriculture and Nitrogen Fertilizer

Hassnae Maher; Rachid Moussadek; Abdelmjid Zouahri; et al. Nitrogen 2023. doi:10.3390/nitrogen4040026

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e2c2254e444b3d8d97402314e5dfba9dd819c45a789c3082d919e9ff2e5b094d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nitrogen starvation negatively affected spike and seed traits.

    Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation · 2017

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.