Claim · model-written summary
BA alone generally did not reduce Fuji apple fruit set.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BA (Accel)e0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- did not generally reducee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom.”
t0“Apple”
Title
Chemical Thinning ‘Fuji’ Apple in theMidwest
David C. Ferree; John C. Schmid Journal of American Pomological Society 2000. doi:10.71318/apom.2000.54.2.61
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect NAA did not adequately thin Fuji apple fruit.
- Intervention effect NAD did not adequately thin Fuji apple fruit.
- Intervention effect NAA increased pygmy fruit in Fuji apple.
- Intervention effect NAD increased pygmy fruit in Fuji apple.
- Intervention effect Multiple ethephon sprays increased Fuji apple return bloom.
- Intervention effect Scoring increased Fuji apple return bloom.
- Intervention effect Carbaryl alone generally did not reduce Fuji apple fruit set.
- Intervention effect Combined carbaryl and BA significantly thinned Fuji apple in two of five years.
- Intervention effect Combined carbaryl and BA increased Fuji apple return bloom in four of five years.
- Intervention effect Endothall at bloom reduced Fuji apple fruit set in two of three limb treatment years.