Paper · 2000 · Journal of American Pomological Society

Chemical Thinning ‘Fuji’ Apple in theMidwest

David C. Ferree; John C. Schmid

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

‘Fuji’/M.7 apple trees in a commercial orchard were treated with a range of chemical thinners over 7 years to determine their effectiveness. NAA and NAD did not adequately thin and did increase pygmy fruit. Multiple sprays of ethephon and scoring increased return bloom. Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom. In 2 of 3 years of limb treatments, Endothall applied at bloom reduced set.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA did not adequately thin Fuji apple fruit.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
thine0
Direction
did not adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and NAD did not adequately thin and did increase pygmy fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAD did not adequately thin Fuji apple fruit.

Treatment
NADe0
Outcome
thine0
Direction
did not adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and NAD did not adequately thin and did increase pygmy fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA increased pygmy fruit in Fuji apple.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
pygmy fruite0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and NAD did not adequately thin and did increase pygmy fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAD increased pygmy fruit in Fuji apple.

Treatment
NADe0
Outcome
pygmy fruite0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and NAD did not adequately thin and did increase pygmy fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple ethephon sprays increased Fuji apple return bloom.

Treatment
Multiple sprays of ethephone0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple sprays of ethephon and scoring increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scoring increased Fuji apple return bloom.

Treatment
scoringe0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple sprays of ethephon and scoring increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl alone generally did not reduce Fuji apple fruit set.

Treatment
carbaryle0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not generally reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA alone generally did not reduce Fuji apple fruit set.

Treatment
BA (Accel)e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not generally reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined carbaryl and BA significantly thinned Fuji apple in two of five years.

Treatment
carbaryl or BA (Accel)e0
Outcome
thinninge0
Value
2 out of 5 yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined carbaryl and BA increased Fuji apple return bloom in four of five years.

Treatment
carbaryl or BA (Accel)e0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4 out of 5 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although carbaryl or BA (Accel) did not generally reduce fruit set when applied alone, the combination caused significant thinning 2 out of 5 years and 4 out of 5 years increased return bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endothall at bloom reduced Fuji apple fruit set in two of three limb treatment years.

Treatment
Endothall applied at bloome0
Outcome
sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2 of 3 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2 of 3 years of limb treatments, Endothall applied at bloom reduced set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.