Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 and urea did not affect peach carotene and anthocyanin.

A claim from RESPONSE OF EARLY GRAND PEACH TO CHEMICAL THINNING; ETHREL, GIBBERELLIC ACID AND UREA. I. YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 and urea did not affect peach carotene and anthocyanin.

Treatment
both GA3 and urea treatmentse0
Outcome
carotene and anthocyanine0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EARLY GRAND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29
e0

“carotene and anthocyanin were increased by ethrel and were not affected by both GA3 and urea treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–985

Title

RESPONSE OF EARLY GRAND PEACH TO CHEMICAL THINNING; ETHREL, GIBBERELLIC ACID AND UREA. I. YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

Thanaa Ezz,; Amal El-Kobbia Journal of Plant Production 2000. doi:10.21608/jpp.2000.259569

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e2f58a68e306b9de5f19cac87a31ba3430b422fbf6f0623496bbb782a85982fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.