Intervention effectmodel-written summary

leaf improved by 15.58 -80.81% under magnetized brackish water.

A claim from Salinity stress mitigation of some canola cultivars grown under South Sinai conditions using magnetic water technology · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf improved by 15.58 -80.81% under magnetized brackish water.

Treatment
irrigation with brackish-watere0
Outcome
leafe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
15.58 -80.81%e0
Comparator
brackish-watere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percent of improvement compared to irrigation with brackish-water ranged between 10.78-16.02% for growth parameters, 28.33-31.76% for dry matter of plant; 15.58 -80.81% for leaf;10.71-63.88% for stems and2.42-54.48% for mineral content of leaves at 85 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1902
t0

“Salinity stress mitigation of some canola cultivars grown under South Sinai conditions using magnetic water technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118

Title

Salinity stress mitigation of some canola cultivars grown under South Sinai conditions using magnetic water technology

Mahmoud Hozayn; SM Azza; Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt; et al. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 2021. doi:10.18697/ajfand.96.19280

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e2fbb67645dcaf5abe69f2d6e6310cac9d3ddae1b1c8f28a03175dea7570b358 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.