Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn yield with two glyphosate applications was not significantly reduced.

A claim from Rotating a Field of Mature Miscanthus × giganteus to Glyphosate‐Resistant Crops · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield with two glyphosate applications was not significantly reduced.

Treatment
two sequential glyphosate applicationse0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Value
0.3e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields also were not significantly reduced with two sequential glyphosate applications, but were generally reduced with one glyphosate application (0.3 and 7.0%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1319

Title

Rotating a Field of Mature Miscanthus × giganteus to Glyphosate‐Resistant Crops

Eric K. Anderson; Thomas B. Voigt; Germán A. Bollero; et al. Agronomy Journal 2011. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0091

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e34ead87e0603339aee1e8b50c6e9bc8ebd4e7c52ae7678189131000d6df211c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.