Paper · 2015 · HortScience

Goss’s Wilt Incidence in Sweet Corn Is Independent of Transgenic Traits and Glyphosate

Martin M. Williams; Carl A. Bradley; Stephen O. Duke; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recently, claims have been made that the use of glyphosate and transgenic crop traits increases plant susceptibility to pathogens. Transgenic traits used widely for years in dent corn are now available in commercial sweet corn cultivars, specifically, the combination of glyphosate resistance (GR) and Lepidoptera control (Bt). The objective was to assess the interactions of the GR+Bt trait, glyphosate, and Goss’s wilt on sweet corn. Nine treatments were tested under weed-free conditions at two sites in 2013 and 2014. Treatments included two isogenic cultivars differing only in the presence or absence of GR+Bt, with and without postemergence application of glyphosate, and inoculation with the causal agent of Goss’s wilt ( Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. nebraskensis ) before glyphosate application, after glyphosate application, or no inoculation. Results failed to show glyphosate or the GR+Bt trait influenced sweet corn susceptibility to Goss’s wilt. The only factor affecting Goss’s wilt incidence was whether plants were inoculated with C. michiganensis ssp. nebraskensis . In the absence of glyphosate application, yet under weed-free conditions, several yield traits were higher in sweet corn with the GR+Bt trait. Results showed that the GR transgene confers the same level of tolerance to glyphosate in sweet corn as observed previously in dent corn. If true, recent claims about glyphosate and transgenic traits increasing plant disease would be of major concern in sweet corn; however, no relationships were found between the GR+Bt trait and/or glyphosate to Goss’s wilt incidence in sweet corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate did not influence sweet corn susceptibility to Goss’s wilt.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
Goss’s wilte0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to Goss’s wilte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Results failed to show glyphosate or the GR+Bt trait influenced sweet corn susceptibility to Goss’s wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GR+Bt trait did not influence sweet corn susceptibility to Goss’s wilt.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
GR+Bt traite0
Interactor
Goss’s wilte0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to Goss’s wilte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Results failed to show glyphosate or the GR+Bt trait influenced sweet corn susceptibility to Goss’s wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with C. michiganensis ssp. nebraskensis affected sweet corn Goss’s wilt incidence.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
inoculated with C. michiganensis ssp. nebraskensise0
Interactor
C. michiganensis ssp. nebraskensisClavibacter michiganensise0pathogen
Outcome
Goss’s wilt incidencee0
Comparator
whether plants were inoculatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Clavibacter michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis · InteractorMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only factor affecting Goss’s wilt incidence was whether plants were inoculated with C. michiganensis ssp. nebraskensis .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under weed-free conditions without glyphosate, several sweet corn yield traits were higher with GR+Bt.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
GR+Bt traite0
Outcome
yield traitse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
absence of glyphosate applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of glyphosate application, yet under weed-free conditions, several yield traits were higher in sweet corn with the GR+Bt trait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GR transgene conferred sweet corn tolerance to glyphosate at the same level previously seen in dent corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
GR transgenee0
Outcome
tolerance to glyphosatee0
Direction
same levele0
Comparator
dent corne0

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the GR transgene confers the same level of tolerance to glyphosate in sweet corn as observed previously in dent corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1367 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

glyphosate · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transgenic · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

transgenic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 93 positive, 67 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.