Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NPK-Zn improved leaf-K/Na ratio, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield relative to NPK under salinity stress.

A claim from Suitable management options to improve the productivity of rice cultivars under salinity stress · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK-Zn improved leaf-K/Na ratio, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield relative to NPK under salinity stress.

Treatment
NPK-Zne0
Outcome
leaf-K/Na ratio, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE), and grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under the salinity stresse0
Comparator
NPK optione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf-K/Na ratio, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE), and grain yield of rice cultivars under the salinity stress were improved by the NPK-gypsum and NPK-Zn options relatively to the NPK option”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–998

Title

Suitable management options to improve the productivity of rice cultivars under salinity stress

Valère Cesse Mel; Vincent Boubié Bado; Saliou Ndiaye; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2018. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1552785

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e35239fa2a8c23baa99755d7080db43a0188e9fb8639b902408fe6f90d6b6dbf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.