Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grain weight was reduced in no-mulch and no-till plots.

A claim from Growth and productivity of corn as affected by mulching and tillage in Alley cropping systems · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight was reduced in no-mulch and no-till plots.

Treatment
no-mulch and no-tille0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower productivity in the no-mulch and no-till plots, mainly due to the reduction of grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1280
t0

“corn as affected by mulching and tillage in Alley cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–93

Title

Growth and productivity of corn as affected by mulching and tillage in Alley cropping systems

Emanoel Gomes de Moura; Jonas Mendes Albuquerque; Alana das Chagas Ferreira Aguiar Scientia Agricola 2008. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162008000200014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e37d1dd2153e68d3f6b017ea217b9d83dba66c84c5d3a145bd7992b18e3b176a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.