Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 75% RDN plus two nano-urea sprays increased plant height and dry matter.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen levels and foliar application of nano-urea on productivity of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend Stuntz] · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDN plus two nano-urea sprays increased plant height and dry matter.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Organ / stage
60 DAS and at harveste0
Treatment
75% RDN + two spray of nano-urea (4 ml/litre) at 25 & 45 DASe0
Outcome
plant height and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The independent application of 75% RDN + two spray of nano-urea (4 ml/litre) at 25 & 45 DAS at 60 DAS and at harvest produced significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation at 60 DAS and at harvest, number of effective tillers plant-1 at 40 DAS, ear head length(cm), test weight (g), grain yield, stover yield, biological yield, net returns and B:C ratio as compared to rest of the treatments and remained at par with 100% RDN + two spray of nano-urea (4 ml/litre) at 25 & 45 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1745
t0

“pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend Stuntz]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–138

Title

Effect of nitrogen levels and foliar application of nano-urea on productivity of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend Stuntz]

Khem Raj Meena; OP Sharma; Devi Lal Dhaker; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i10sd.1764

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e37d5ea6eeb3646fd53b7d4a68088c46db602a5cd48c675e409589d95a15b392 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.