Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Number of tillers of barley was maximum under T11 compared with all treatments.

A claim from Combined effect of nutrient management and biofertilizer on productivity and economic benefit of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of tillers of barley was maximum under T11 compared with all treatments.

Material
variety RD-2036e5
Treatment
T11- (100% RDF + ZnSO₄ 25 kg/ha + FeSO₄ 10 kg/ha + Azotobacter + PSB)e1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
number of tillerse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
91.3e1
Comparator
all the treatmentse2
Setting
Chittorgarh (Rajasthan)e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“economic benefit of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–124
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Instructional Farm, Department of Agriculture under Mewar University Gangrar, Chittorgarh (Rajasthan) during Rabi season of 2024-25”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180
e1

“maximum plant height (91.30 cm), number of tillers (91.3), dry matter per m row length (91.30 g) and yield parameter such as number of number of effective tillers (82.00 per m row length), length of ears (10.13 cm), spike length (11.05 cm), grains per year (48.0), grain yield (51.93 q/ha), straw yield (76.92 q/ha) and biological yield (128.85 q/ha) was recorded with application of T11- (100% RDF + ZnSO₄ 25 kg/ha + FeSO₄ 10 kg/ha + Azotobacter + PSB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–799
e2

“in compare to all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–966
e5

“barley “variety RD-2036””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–315

Title

Combined effect of nutrient management and biofertilizer on productivity and economic benefit of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Shivani Sharma; Deepak Mishra; Manohar Lal Meghwal; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2025. doi:10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i8d.615

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e3bd3e6525588c16b13ee9556cad32b3de608638f1ad6eaebb1aecbf7f632e29 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.