Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphate deprivation significantly lowered phosphate content in wheat shoots and roots over one to three weeks.

A claim from PHOSPHATE DEFICIENCY AFFECTS ACID PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY AND GROWTH OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate deprivation significantly lowered phosphate content in wheat shoots and roots over one to three weeks.

Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
nutrient medium without phosphate (−P)e0
Outcome
Pi contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
one to three weekse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pi content decreased significantly in the shoots and roots of all plants grown for one to three weeks in the nutrient medium without phosphate (−P).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–319
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78

Title

PHOSPHATE DEFICIENCY AFFECTS ACID PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY AND GROWTH OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES

Iwona Ciereszko; Agnieszka Szczygła; Ewa Żebrowska Journal of Plant Nutrition 2011. doi:10.1080/01904167.2011.544351

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e3c159292d03635aac31af9da6ee21df4fa5f252ee14564f31ea422715f0f31a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

in vitro · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 35 positive, 18 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.