Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Distal leaf removal improved fruity and floral aroma intensity in grape metabolites.

A claim from Reducing the source/sink ratio of grapevine to face global warming in a semi-arid climate: Effects on volatile composition of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distal leaf removal improved fruity and floral aroma intensity in grape metabolites.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
distal leaf removale0
Outcome
fruity and floral aroma intensitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
grape metabolitese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement in fruity and floral aroma intensity by distal leaf removal was founded not only in grape metabolites but also in wines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–786
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43

Title

Reducing the source/sink ratio of grapevine to face global warming in a semi-arid climate: Effects on volatile composition of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines

Hao-Cheng Lu; Li Hu; Yao Liu; et al. Food Chemistry X 2022. doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100449

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e3d62cb43d40c6d2aa5f6acc1e613af5877cdffcf840f33fbe7188edc6d806d0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.