Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip fertigation at 0.8 ETc and 100% RDN increased nitrogen use efficiency over control by 13.9 %.

A claim from Drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield, water productivity and profitability of cotton raised under high density planting system in semi-arid environment · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation at 0.8 ETc and 100% RDN increased nitrogen use efficiency over control by 13.9 %.

Treatment
drip fertigation at 0.8 ETc and 100% RDNe0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.9 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of drip fertigation at 0.8 ETc and 100% RDN elucidated 11.6, 61.5, 13.9 %, and 42.9 % higher SCY, water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency and benefit: cost ratio than control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1474
t0

“seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43

Title

Drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield, water productivity and profitability of cotton raised under high density planting system in semi-arid environment

Kulvir Singh; Pankaj Rathore; Ajmer Singh Brar; et al. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2021. doi:10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i9.2751

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e44698e3b2ccc83a048370d159ac1e67f9e49135e36b548c52ee44272fae1df0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.