Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA₃ with urea boosted quality of berries compared with the control.

A claim from Impact of Spraying ‘Early Sweet’ Grapevines with Gibberellic Acid and Urea for Reducing Shot Berries Percentage and Improving Yield and Cluster Quality · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA₃ with urea boosted quality of berries compared with the control.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Treatment
GA₃ along with ureae0
Outcome
quality of berriese0
Direction
boostede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying GA₃ along with urea during different growth stages significantly boosted both yield and quality of berries compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1124
t0

“‘Early Sweet’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–43

Title

Impact of Spraying ‘Early Sweet’ Grapevines with Gibberellic Acid and Urea for Reducing Shot Berries Percentage and Improving Yield and Cluster Quality

Doaa M. Hamza Journal of Plant Production 2025. doi:10.21608/jpp.2025.438290.1529

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e45d4b30fba4be4ae99761a42dccda46d67e8583002bd94defcb7813dc72d9f0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · quality: general · VitisResults differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
    Nitrogen omission after August had no effect on berry quality.

    Nutritional and physiological studies on grapevine. V. · 1963

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.