Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% RDN + foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea at tillering and PI stage gave higher leaf area index (4.80).

A claim from Effect of Rice Cultivation Practices and Nitrogen Management strategies on Growth and Yield Attributes in Rice under Rice-cowpea Cropping System · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDN + foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea at tillering and PI stage gave higher leaf area index (4.80).

Treatment
100% RDN + foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea at tillering and PI stagee0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.80e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, among nitrogen management strategies, application of 100% RDN + foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea at tillering and PI stage were found significantly higher number of green leaves hill-1 (87.34), leaf area index (4.80), SPAD value (44.70), panicle length (20.73 cm), lower number of chaffy grains panicle-1(15.28) and test weight (24.35 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–971
t0

“among rice cultivation practices transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–394

Title

Effect of Rice Cultivation Practices and Nitrogen Management strategies on Growth and Yield Attributes in Rice under Rice-cowpea Cropping System

Sandeep S N; P.S Fathima; S.B Yogananda; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2024. doi:10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i123149

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e4628d58f1a02cb78c035e9e5d9107b2528c07c1f3b9ab29fed405d4a255bc34 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

304 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.