Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spinetoram was consistently superior by infestation and damage measures.

A claim from Evaluation of chemical insecticides against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram was consistently superior by infestation and damage measures.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Spinetoram 11.7% SCe0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
consistently superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad 45% SC, Spinetoram 11.7% SC and Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC were found consistently superior among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–608
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–103

Title

Evaluation of chemical insecticides against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize

Ajaya Shree Ratna Bajracharya; Binu Bhat Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council 2024. doi:10.3126/jnarc.v10i1.73327

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e4988da6db6c14528aaef69adaaf757257ffa7154a77c8c511fd3aa99f9f54e7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Spinetoram · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.