Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chlorpyrifos plus Cypermethrin was effective compared with control.

A claim from Evaluation of chemical insecticides against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos plus Cypermethrin was effective compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chlorpyrifos 50% + Cypermethrin 5% ECe0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
effectivee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorpyrifos 50% + Cypermethrin 5% EC was also found effective in comparison to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–956
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–103

Title

Evaluation of chemical insecticides against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize

Ajaya Shree Ratna Bajracharya; Binu Bhat Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council 2024. doi:10.3126/jnarc.v10i1.73327

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-eac2b2428672a70292c18c9dfdef38e82e55633d18d6e85797025a82fa55e1fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

chlorpyrifos · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cypermethrin · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.