Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of Different Pesticides against Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under Laboratory Conditions in Rupandehi, Nepal

Dipak Khanal; Dipesh Subedi; Gaurave Banjade; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda , is a highly destructive pest recently reported in various Asian countries and originated in the subtropical regions of America. It was first recorded in Nepal on May 9, 2019. This invasive species poses a significant threat to maize production because it can undergo multiple generations, migrate, and feed on a wide range of host plants. A laboratory study was conducted with 3 categories of pesticides: conventional, newer, and bio‐rational. The study focused on evaluating the efficacy of these pesticides on the third‐instar larvae of S. frugiperda . The treatments included (1) newer chemical pesticides: spinosad 45% suspension concentrate (SC) (Tracer 1 ml/3 L of water), spinetoram 11.7% SC (Delegate 0.5 ml/L of water), chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC (Allcora 1 ml/2.5 L of water), emamectin benzoate 5.7% water dispersible granules (WDG) (top killer 1 g/2.5 L), (2) conventional pesticide: chlorpyrifos 50% EC (Predator 2 ml/L), and (3) bio‐rational pesticides : Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki 0.5% wettable powder (WP) (Maharashtra 2gm/L), Metarhizium anisopliae 1.0% WP (Kalichakra 5 ml/L), Beauveria bassiana 2% AS (DamanL 5 ml/L), Azadirachta indica 4.5% (Neemix 5 ml/L), Syzygium aromaticum 100% v/v (Kanti herbal Clove oil 3 ml/L), and spinosad 45% SC (Tracer 0.3 ml/L). Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW. The results revealed that spinetoram and spinosad caused 100% larval mortality within the first 24 hours after treatment. Similarly, spinosad (99.99%) and clove oil (76.64%) were the most effective bio‐rational pesticides followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis . The newer and bio‐rational pesticides that showed high efficacy could be suggested for further study in farmers’ fields. They could be recommended for testing as a component of integrated pest management for effective management of FAW in Nepal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram caused 100% fall armyworm larval mortality within 24 hours.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
spinetorame0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinetoram and spinosad caused 100% larval mortality within the first 24 hours after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad caused 100% larval mortality within 24 hours.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
larval mortalitye0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinetoram and spinosad caused 100% larval mortality within the first 24 hours after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-rational spinosad had 99.99% efficacy against fall armyworm larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
most effective bio‐rational pesticidese0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
99.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad (99.99%) and clove oil (76.64%) were the most effective bio‐rational pesticides followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clove oil had 76.64% efficacy against fall armyworm larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
clove oile0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
most effective bio‐rational pesticidese0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
76.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad (99.99%) and clove oil (76.64%) were the most effective bio‐rational pesticides followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana followed the top bio-rational pesticides in efficacy.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
followed by B. bassianae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis followed the top bio-rational pesticides in efficacy.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
B. thuringiensise0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Second interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend field testing effective pesticides for FAW management in Nepal.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
FAWe0pest
Outcome
testing as a component of integrated pest managemente0
Setting
Nepale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They could be recommended for testing as a component of integrated pest management for effective management of FAW in Nepal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh maize leaves were treated using the leaf dip method and then fed to 3rd instar larvae of FAW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1438 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

spinosad · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Spinetoram · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.