Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 47.8% over the uninoculated check.

A claim from Effect of interaction between Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus fasciculatum) and root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior Glomus fasciculatum inoculation significantly increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 47.8% over the uninoculated check.

Treatment
Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognitae0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Second interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
fresh shoot weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47.8%e0
Comparator
uninoculated checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · Second interactorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) inoculated ten days prior to root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resulted significant increase in shoot length (21.5%), root length (29.4%), fresh shoot weight (47.8%), fresh root weight (23.0%), dry shoot weight (73.2%), dry root weight (73.9%), number of branches (44.7%), root volume (34.4%) and phosphorus content of plants (55.5%) over uninoculated check followed by the treatment receiving simultaneous inoculation of G. fasciculatum and M. incognita.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–543
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137

Title

Effect of interaction between Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus fasciculatum) and root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato

B.K. Samal; J.K. Mahalik; B.K. Dash; et al. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-0163.2018.00081.2

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e4c4348a5faaba639d16d529107fb479fc73d4d216059ac87f697606420370f1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Meloidogyne javanica · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.