Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Non-stabilized urea-di-ammonium phosphate fertilization was largely ineffective for maize field establishment, nutrient acquisition and yield

A claim from The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-stabilized urea-di-ammonium phosphate fertilization was largely ineffective for maize field establishment, nutrient acquisition and yield

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Treatment
non-stabilized urea-di-ammonium phosphate fertilizatione6
Outcome
field establishment, nutrient acquisition, and yield formatione5
Direction
largely ineffectivee6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96
e5

“The combination of stabilized ammonium with a range of consortium products based on T. harzianum OMG16, B. amyloliquefaciens, micronutrients, and humic acids completely compensated the effect of a TSP fertilization on field establishment, nutrient acquisition, and yield formation in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2343
e6

“non-stabilized urea-di-ammonium phosphate fertilization was largely ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2351–2430

Title

The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize

Isaac Kwadwo Mpanga; Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe; Mira Kuhlmann; et al. Microorganisms 2019. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7020038

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e4e1a3d006fe38f1f38e099ee5f8fbb27bece5bf5c195642672c45d9506fcbfe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

phosphate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.