Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar Fe-Gly, Fe-Tyr, and Fe-Chi increased grain iron concentration relative to Fe-EDDHA.

A claim from Fortification of bread wheat with iron through soil and foliar application of iron-organic-complexes · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe-Gly, Fe-Tyr, and Fe-Chi increased grain iron concentration relative to Fe-EDDHA.

Treatment
foliar application of Fe-Gly, Fe-Tyr, and Fe-Chie0
Outcome
Fe concentration in the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fe-EDDHAe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of Fe-Gly, Fe-Tyr, and Fe-Chi increased Fe concentration in the grain compared to Fe-EDDHA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1099
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–28

Title

Fortification of bread wheat with iron through soil and foliar application of iron-organic-complexes

Atena Mirbolook; MirHassan Rasouli-Sadaghiani; Ebrahim Sepehr; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1862206

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e54c20e7ff69f6339397744f55e34bac93b6d654b4444b85257dba669948141a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Foliar Fe increased grain Fe concentration by 21%.

    Response of Wheat Plants to Zinc, Iron, and Manganese Applications and Uptake and Concentration of Zinc, Iron, and Manganese in Wheat Grains · 2009

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Fe stress did not significantly influence Cd uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

    Phytosiderophores Influence on Cadmium Mobilization and Uptake by Wheat and Barley Plants · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fe had little effect on Zn or Mn transport in wheat.

    Manipulation of xylem transport affects Zn and Mn transport into developing wheat grains of cultured ears · 1996

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar iron did not significantly affect grain iron concentration in wheat cultivars.

    Effects of foliar application of micronutrients on concentration and bioavailability of zinc and iron in wheat landraces and cultivars · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Urea did not further increase iron translocation from dark-induced senescent leaves.

    Inclusion of urea in a 59FeEDTA solution stimulated leaf penetration and translocation of 59Fe within wheat plants · 2014

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Ionomics showed few differences in root Na+ uptake and vacuolar Na+ sequestration between two Fe levels under salt stress.

    Low iron ameliorates the salinity‐induced growth cessation of seminal roots in wheat seedlings · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Fe deficiency-induced Zn2+ uptake was more enhanced than absorption of Zn-phytosiderophore complexes in short-term uptake experiments in bread wheat.

    Iron deficiency‐induced zinc uptake by bread wheat · 2019 · compared with absorption of Zn‐phytosiderophore (PS) complexes

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  8. no effect
    wheat shoot dry weight and Fe concentration did not respond to Fe(OH) 3.

    Iron accumulation in root apoplasm of dicotyledonous and graminaceous species grown on calcareous soil · 1999

    Opposite direction

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Foliar Zn increased grain Zn concentration by 99% over two years.

    Response of Wheat Plants to Zinc, Iron, and Manganese Applications and Uptake and Concentration of Zinc, Iron, and Manganese in Wheat Grains · 2009

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Foliar application led to less than 1% of fertilizer nitrogen absorbed into wheat grain.

    EFFECTS OF FOLIAR- AND SOIL-APPLIED NITROGEN AND SOIL NITRATE-NITROGEN LEVEL ON THE PROTEIN CONTENT OF NEEPAWA WHEAT · 1972

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar P addition did not downregulate root P uptake in wheat (isotopic dilution test of the substitution hypothesis)

    Assessment of foliar-applied phosphorus fertiliser formulations to enhance phosphorus nutrition and grain production in wheat · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zn concentration in wheat was not changed when plants were sprayed at early stem elongation.

    Effects of foliar application of zinc sulfate at different phenological stages on yield formation and grain zinc content of bread wheat (cv. Kohdasht) · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Foliar N had no adverse effect on grain nitrogen/sulphur ratio in cv. Avalon.

    Recovery of 15N‐labelled urea applied to the foliage of winter wheat · 1987

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar P had limited effect on phytate and grain iron content.

    Response of canola, wheat, and pea to foliar phosphorus fertilization at a phosphorus-deficient site in eastern Saskatchewan · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing foliar potassium rate did not improve grain nutrient content.

    EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM ON YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT OF WHEAT GRAINS GROWN IN SANDY SOILS · 1999

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Mendok sprays did not cause male or female gamete sterility in wheat.

    Increase in Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. variety ‘N.P. 718’) · 1969

    Opposite direction

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.