Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dipping infected chickpea seed in these hydrogen peroxide or streptocycline treatments did not reduce germination.

A claim from Bacterial wilt of chickpea caused by Xanthomonas campestris (Pam.) Dowson · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping infected chickpea seed in these hydrogen peroxide or streptocycline treatments did not reduce germination.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Dipping infected seed in 30% hydrogen peroxide alone or with streptocycline (1000 p.p.m.)e1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Dipping infected seed in 30% hydrogen peroxide alone or with streptocycline (1000 p.p.m.) gave complete control of seedborne infection without reducing germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–409
e0

“Cicer arietinum seeds received at the Plant Quarantine Unit for export were infected by a pathovar of X. campestris which either killed the seeds before germination, or seedlings soon after emergence or caused a progressive wilt of older plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–244

Title

Bacterial wilt of chickpea caused by Xanthomonas campestris (Pam.) Dowson

J. R. Reddy; Kmf Ahmed; B.K. Varma Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) 1988

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e5a7d10545360c6a1e141af9d2086b2c136f385beb4b0418be0cb63728d58686 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 69 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.