Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium alone markedly increased plant nitrogen content and grain yield.

A claim from INTERACTION BETWEEN A VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA AND RHIZOBIUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN IN THE FIELD · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium alone markedly increased plant nitrogen content and grain yield.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Rhizobium only inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen content of the plant and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96
e0

“Rhizobium only inoculation markedly increased the nitrogen content of the plant and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–778

Title

INTERACTION BETWEEN A VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA AND RHIZOBIUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN IN THE FIELD

D. J. BAGYARAJ; A. Manjunath; R. B. Patil New Phytologist 1979. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb07568.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e693695c4108e05a1f973bd79f3901621f5446baaf0ed2299bbbcfe0ac7d0b56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 83 positive, 9 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

83 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

557 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.