Intervention effectmodel-written summary

pyroxasulfone at 0.1275 kg a.i ha -1 as PE, followed by topramezone at 0.252 kg a.i ha -1 as PoE at 20 DAS fb hand weeding at 40 DAS produced stover yield of 7195 kg ha -1, statistically on par with the top herbicide treatment.

A claim from EFFECT OF NEW PRE AND POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDE MOLECULES IN KHARIF MAIZE · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

pyroxasulfone at 0.1275 kg a.i ha -1 as PE, followed by topramezone at 0.252 kg a.i ha -1 as PoE at 20 DAS fb hand weeding at 40 DAS produced stover yield of 7195 kg ha -1, statistically on par with the top herbicide treatment.

Taxon
KHARIF MAIZEt0
Treatment
pyroxasulfone at 0.1275 kg a.i ha -1 as PE, followed by topramezone at 0.252 kg a.i ha -1 as PoE at 20 DAS fb hand weeding at 40 DASe0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
on pare0
Value
7195 kg ha -1e0
Comparator
Thise0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“KHARIF MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72
e0

“This was statistically on par with the treatment of pyroxasulfone at 0.1275 kg a.i ha -1 as PE, followed by topramezone at 0.252 kg a.i ha -1 as PoE at 20 DAS fb hand weeding at 40 DAS (6406 and 7195 kg ha -1 for grain and stover, respectively), as well as the mesotrione + atrazine (RM) combination at 0.875 kg a.i ha -1 as PoE at 20 DAS fb hand weeding at 40 DAS (6250 and 6944 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2448

Title

EFFECT OF NEW PRE AND POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDE MOLECULES IN KHARIF MAIZE

PLANT ARCHIVES 2024. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2025.v25.supplement-1.140

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e6f57e1d22989a287089f9b098ab64989f274babeed3dd8d47d06dcfc1ed800b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

pyroxasulfone · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

topramezone · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.