Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same fertilizer combination gave maximum green cob yield of 7.26 t ha-1.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen and zinc levels on growth, yield and economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilizer combination gave maximum green cob yield of 7.26 t ha-1.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1 in combination with 1.5% zinc conc.e1
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.26 t ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“This combination has also recorded maximum cob weight with husk (81.46 g), green cob yield (7.26 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–816
e1

“Application of 120 kg N ha-1 in combination with 1.5% zinc conc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–660
t0

“baby corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–92

Title

Effect of nitrogen and zinc levels on growth, yield and economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.)

Shalini Roy; Vikram Singh; Sachchidanand Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e6ffd6c05e8603d00b7c8cd8dad2afbbd79d7916b44483b8e9cdc7773270a6b4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Number of leaves per plant was significantly higher under combined nitrogen, zinc and iron treatment.

    Effect of Nitrogen, Zinc and Iron on Growth and Yield of Baby-corn (Zea mays L.) Prayagraj Condition · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Adding Zn to the intermediate Fe level accentuated Fe deficiency and depressed corn yield.

    Nutrient Balance Involving Phosphorus, Iron, and Zinc · 1965 · compared with intermediate Fe level

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Corn yield at zero zinc and 3.0 mM phosphorus was significantly lower than at 1.0 mM phosphorus.

    Potential for Phosphorus Toxicity in Zinc‐Stressed Corn and Potato · 1981 · compared with 1.0 m M P

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Most foliar Zn applications had no grain-yield effect.

    Effect of Foliar Micronutrients (B, Mn, Fe, Zn) on Maize Grain Yield, Micronutrient Recovery, Uptake, and Partitioning · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    In a pot experiment the highest Zn rate (250 ppm) slightly reduced corn yield.

    EFFECTS OF SOIL PROPERTIES AND AMENDMENTS ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ZINC IN SOILS · 1974

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Zn alone or P alone reduced aboveground dry matter and yield at harvest by 8-85% in LCV and FER soils relative to unfertilized plants

    Combining P and Zn fertilization to enhance yield and grain quality in maize grown on Mediterranean soils · 2021 · compared with unfertilized (control) plants

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Maize grain yield did not respond to zinc application.

    Yield-limiting plant nutrients for maize production in northwest Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Soil Zn did not affect maize yield at any Cd concentration.

    Cadmium‐zinc interaction in maize grown on sewer water irrigated soil · 1993

    Opposite direction

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Number of leaves per plant was significantly higher under combined nitrogen, zinc and iron treatment.

    Effect of Nitrogen, Zinc and Iron on Growth and Yield of Baby-corn (Zea mays L.) Prayagraj Condition · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Low nitrogen decreased maize grain yield.

    Within-Leaf Nitrogen Allocation in Adaptation to Low Nitrogen Supply in Maize during Grain-Filling Stage · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Nitrogen timing did not affect corn production in the other two years.

    Corn Production as Affected by Nitrogen Application Timing and Tillage · 2004

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    For the two years after 1992, losses were significantly higher for 134 kg N ha−1 on the clay loam.

    Nitrate Leaching and Nitrogen Budget as Affected by Maize Nitrogen Rate and Soil Type · 2000

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Nitrogen stress reduced kernel number of maize in field conditions.

    Nitrogen Deficiency in Maize: II. Carbon‐Nitrogen Interaction Effects on Kernel Number and Grain Yield · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    At high N rates, yields under the two tillage systems were approximately equal.

    Soil Nitrogen Availability after Long‐term Continuous No‐tillage and Conventional Tillage Corn Production · 1986

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Pretreatment with inhibitors of NOS and nitrate reductase blocked the water stress-induced increase in NO production in maize.

    Nitric Oxide Reduces Hydrogen Peroxide Accumulation Involved in Water Stress‐induced Subcellular Anti‐oxidant Defense in Maize Plants · 2008

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Amending urea with KCI did not significantly change yield, ear-leaf nitrogen or nitrogen uptake in the tested year.

    Nitrogen Fertilizer Source, and Method and Time of Application Effects on No‐till Corn Yields and Nitrogen Uptakes1 · 1986 · compared with unamended surface‐applied counterparts

    Opposite direction

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.