Claim · model-written summary
No coating reduced blueberry weight loss in either year.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“None of the coatings reduced weight loss in either year of the study and sometimes enhanced it”
t0“Blueberry Coating”
Title
Investigations into Determinants of Blueberry Coating Effectiveness
David Obenland; Francisco M. A. Leyva-Gutierrez; Tong Wang Foods 2022. doi:10.3390/foods12010174
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Some coatings enhanced weight loss.
- Intervention effect Chitosan coating removed all or part of the waxy bloom.
- Intervention effect Chitosan plus oleic acid removed all or part of the waxy bloom.
- Intervention effect Carnauba wax removed all or part of the waxy bloom.
- Intervention effect Semperfresh removed all or part of the waxy bloom.
- Intervention effect Sodium caseinate partly removed bloom but generally maintained natural appearance better.
- Intervention effect Coatings did not effectively limit weight loss through the blueberry cuticle.
- Intervention effect Coatings did not effectively limit weight loss through the blueberry stem end.
- Observation Bloom loss occurred during coating application.
- Association Bloom loss did not influence coating effectiveness.
- Intervention effect More handling during CH + OA drying significantly increased later weight loss relative to minimal handling.
- Recommendation The authors recommend careful handling during coating.