Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stomatal conductance of Hanfu scion leaves rose by 42.26% compared with the M. sieversii scion

A claim from Leaf physiological and endophytic microbial community characteristics and interactions of different scions grafted onto Malus sieversii · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance of Hanfu scion leaves rose by 42.26% compared with the M. sieversii scion

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Material
Hanfue1
Treatment
grafted with the Hanfu scione1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee2
Direction
risinge2
Value
42.26%e2
Comparator
M. sieversii scione1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endophytic microbial communities in scion leaves substantially impact the growth efficiency of apple trees (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133
e1

“Compared with the M. sieversii scion, the aboveground (+49.28%) and root (+62.77%) biomass of juvenile trees grafted with the Hanfu scion significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–628
e2

“with the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance rising by 20.40% and 42.26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–729

Title

Leaf physiological and endophytic microbial community characteristics and interactions of different scions grafted onto Malus sieversii

Huanhuan Zhang; Dongdong Yao; Hossam S M Ali; et al. Tree Physiology 2025. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpaf042

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e75fc74af04a8752d09cf6ef15f5b70eb166e098df1178167516efd60588ff5b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

grafting · physiology: gas exchange · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.