Claim · model-written summary
SA had little effect on JA induction of defense protein activity.
- Taxon
- Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thalianat0 - Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- induction of defence protein activitye0
- Direction
- little effecte0
- Comparator
- JAe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Arabidopsis thaliana”
e0“SA had little effect on the induction of defence protein activity by JA”
Title
D. Cipollini; S. Enright; M. B. Traw; et al. Molecular Ecology 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02161.x
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Larval growth differed across Arabidopsis genotypes, highest on Wassilewskija and lowest on nim1-1 and jar1.
- Association Defense protein activities varied by genotype without correlating with insect performance.
- Intervention effect SA increased S. exigua larval growth by approximately 35% across genotypes.
- Intervention effect SA had no discernable effect on four defense protein activities.
- Observation In the second experiment, larval growth was highest on cep1.
- Observation In the second experiment, larval growth was lowest on fad.
- Intervention effect JA generally increased activity of four defense proteins.
- Intervention effect JA increased total glucosinolate levels.
- Intervention effect JA reduced insect growth by approximately 25% across genotypes.
- Intervention effect Simultaneous SA generally inhibited JA-induced resistance to S. exigua.
- Association Larval mass correlated negatively with trypsin inhibitor and polyphenoloxidase activity and glucosinolate levels.
- Association Insect damage correlated negatively with polyphenoloxidase activity.
- Intervention effect SA attenuated JA induction of glucosinolates.