Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping did not reduce maize or cassava growth and yields.

A claim from Effects of Intercropping and Melon Sowing Date on Crop Growth, Soil Micro-Environment and Rhizosphere Fungi and Bacterial Populations of Maize and Cassava · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not reduce maize or cassava growth and yields.

Taxon
maize or cassavaManihot esculentaZea mayse0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
growth and yieldse0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping did not reduce the growth and yields of maize or cassava, but of melon irrespective of the sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–503

Title

Effects of Intercropping and Melon Sowing Date on Crop Growth, Soil Micro-Environment and Rhizosphere Fungi and Bacterial Populations of Maize and Cassava

F. O. Olasantan; O. A. Babalola Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 2007. doi:10.1080/01448765.2007.9755036

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e79ffdd27c79941e53d89d110164abb11c79133f7454c6cb54189e984267e204 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this claim · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.