Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spray of 2% urea with 20 ppm gibberellic acid gave higher crop growth rate (16.20) in tomato.

A claim from Impact of phyto-chemicals with nutrients on growth analytical traits and yield of tomato · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 2% urea with 20 ppm gibberellic acid gave higher crop growth rate (16.20) in tomato.

Treatment
Foliar spray of 2% urea with 20 ppm gibberellic acide0
Outcome
crop growth ratee1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
16.20e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% urea with 20 ppm gibberellic acid registered higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–641
e1

“crop growth rate (16.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–785
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88

Title

Impact of phyto-chemicals with nutrients on growth analytical traits and yield of tomato

R. Sivakumar; S. Srividhya Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e7ce9f4c6f6476523dd32e37a102316afe475d9917506a4176fb24b1e9765f82 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Abscisic acid inhibited radicle emergence in gib-1 seeds despite unchanged LeEXP4 expression.

    Expression of an Expansin Is Associated with Endosperm Weakening during Tomato Seed Germination · 2000

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    GA(3) did not affect parthenocarpic growth of MA/pat-2 and CU/pat-2 fruits.

    The Genepat-2, Which Induces Natural Parthenocarpy, Alters the Gibberellin Content in Unpollinated Tomato Ovaries · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Gibberellic acid retarded redness development in intact tomato fruit and cultured pieces.

    Gibberellin Delays Ripening of Tomatoes · 1967

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Applied GA3 did not affect pat-3/pat-4 fruit growth.

    Role of gibberellins in parthenocarpic fruit development induced by the genetic systempat‐3/pat‐4in tomato · 2001 · compared with absence of pollination and hormone treatment

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    GA3 elongated seedlings.

    Irrigation with 5°C water and paclobutrazol promotes strong seedling growth in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) · 2010

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Stimulate treatments did not significantly change tomato fruit dry mass.

    EFFECTS OF THE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR "STIMULATETM" ON SOME POSTHARVEST QUALITIES OF TOMATO GROWN IN TROPICAL GREENHOUSE · 2010 · compared with control (water)

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    GA3 at 250 mg/L restrained tomato seed germination.

    Effect of Different GA3 on the Germination of Tomato Seed Under Salt Stress · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    GA(3) with brassinolide produced at least six times more internode elongation.

    Genetic and physiological characterization of tomato cv. Micro-Tom · 2006

    Same direction

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 108 positive, 45 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this claim · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Complete nitrogen deprivation rapidly inhibited leaf growth in nitrate-precultured tomato.

    Root-derived cytokinins as long-distance signals for NO3--induced stimulation of leaf growth · 2005 · compared with NO(3)(-) precultured plants

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Lower nitrogen supply reduced tomato vegetative growth.

    Effects of Low Nitrogen Supply on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Fruit Yield and Quality with Special Emphasis on Sugars, Acids, Ascorbate, Carotenoids, and Phenolic Compounds · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Insufficient or excessive nitrogen reduced tomato plant height and node number.

    Nitrogen and water availability to tomato plants triggers bottom-up effects on the leafminer Tuta absoluta · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Ammonium as sole nitrogen source reduced tomato growth.

    Response of ammonium assimilation enzymes to nitrogen form treatments in different plant species1 · 1991

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Foliar ammonium restricted tomato plant height.

    Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Restricted nitrate rapidly restricted structural growth.

    Diel changes in nitrogen and carbon resource status and use for growth in young plants of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Tungstate inhibition of nitrate reductase abolished MWCNT-triggered lateral root formation.

    A Novel Mechanism Underlying Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube-Triggered Tomato Lateral Root Formation: the Involvement of Nitric Oxide · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen aeration did not increase growth of non-aerated tomato.

    Growth Responses of Tomato Plants in Non-aerated Water Culture to Foliar Sprays of Gibberellic Acid and Benzyladenine · 1972

    Opposite direction

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soaking tomato seeds in bacterial isolates for 10 to 30 minutes did not change germination time or seedling growth.

    Activities Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus sp. to Stimulate Germination and Seedling Growth of Tomato Plants · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Foliar fluensulfone reduced plant vigor and dry weight of tomato.

    Efficacy of Various Application Methods of Fluensulfone for Managing Root-knot Nematodes in Vegetables · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Mixing superphosphate into soil before spraying produced greater tomato dry weight reductions.

    Glyphosate residues in a sandy soil affect tomato transplants · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Abscisic acid drenches did not affect final plant size.

    Drought, Paclobutrazol, Abscisic Acid, and Gibberellic Acid as Alternatives to Daminozide in Tomato Transplant Production · 1992

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Foliar ammonium restricted tomato plant height.

    Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Spraying ozonated water at 0.6 to 1.8 mg/L had no significant negative effects on tomato growth.

    Research on the Feasibility of Spraying Micro/Nano Bubble Ozonated Water for Airborne Disease Prevention · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Foliar urea produced less growth than inorganic nitrogen supplied in nutrient solution.

    Absorption and Assimilation of Foliarly Applied Urea in Tomato · 1996 · compared with inorganic N was supplied to the nutrient solution

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliar mineral sprays did not increase growth of non-aerated tomato.

    Growth Responses of Tomato Plants in Non-aerated Water Culture to Foliar Sprays of Gibberellic Acid and Benzyladenine · 1972

    Opposite direction

244 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.