Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NILs had significantly higher relative water content, membrane stability index and proline content than PB 1509 under salinity.

A claim from Marker aided introgression of ‘Saltol’, a major QTL for seedling stage salinity tolerance into an elite Basmati rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NILs had significantly higher relative water content, membrane stability index and proline content than PB 1509 under salinity.

Material
NILse1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
relative water content, membrane stability index and proline contente1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
PB 1509e1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All the NILs exhibited tolerance to salinity with significantly higher relative water content, membrane stability index and proline content as compared to PB 1509”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–884
e2

“Pusa Basmati 1509 (PB 1509), a high yielding and early maturing Basmati rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–232

Title

Marker aided introgression of ‘Saltol’, a major QTL for seedling stage salinity tolerance into an elite Basmati rice variety ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’

Ashutosh Kumar Yadav; Aruna Kumar; Nitasha Grover; et al. Scientific Reports 2020. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70664-0

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e7e4d6a5dbc61635021eee0dae8450dc0de42df9380500544d2413602645170e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salinity · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 6 positive, 27 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.