Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment gave higher B:C ratio of 2.42.

A claim from Effect of Planting Materials and Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of Sugarcane Seed Crop · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment gave higher B:C ratio of 2.42.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
75 per cent of recommended NPK + Azophos + insitu incorporation of sunnhemp + foliar spraying of sugarcane boostere1
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere1
Value
2.42e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–85
e0

“B:C ratio (2.42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1886
e1

“application of 75 per cent of recommended NPK + Azophos + insitu incorporation of sunnhemp + foliar spraying of sugarcane booster resulted in higher establishment percentage (78.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1637

Title

Effect of Planting Materials and Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of Sugarcane Seed Crop

Sugeerthi S.; Jayachandran M.; Chinnusamy C. Madras Agricultural Journal 2018. doi:10.29321/maj.2018.000116

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e7f5a8149937aea53bae55c658f051f2783aa1e0a26cf4c28ed1d8c1ae2c546a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

Crotalaria juncea · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

337 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.