Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silencing of SlPLC4 impaired the Avr4/Cf-4-induced HR in tomato.

A claim from Identification of tomato phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C (PI-PLC) family members and the role of PLC4 and PLC6 in HR and disease resistance · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing of SlPLC4 impaired the Avr4/Cf-4-induced HR in tomato.

Treatment
Silencing of SlPLC4e4
Gene
SlPLC4e4
Outcome
Avr4/Cf-4-induced HRe4
Direction
impairede4

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Identification of tomato phosphatidylinositol-specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54
e4

“Silencing of SlPLC4 impaired the Avr4/Cf-4-induced HR and resulted in increased colonisation of Cf-4 plants by C. fulvum expressing Avr4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1090

Title

Identification of tomato phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C (PI-PLC) family members and the role of PLC4 and PLC6 in HR and disease resistance

Jack H. Vossen; Ahmed Abd-El-Haliem; Emilie F. Fradin; et al. The Plant Journal 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04136.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e865c0b856251f8da8cdcd2411c98014d8ab96cb91f3b5b9a0ea974ad8ca4a80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

loss of function · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 63 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

146 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.