Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In a chemically defined medium rice callus showed no GA3 response, which appears with 2,4-D and GA3 in YE-containing medium.

A claim from Amino Acids as Complementary Factors for the Growth and Redifferentiation of Rice Callus Tissues · 1972

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a chemically defined medium rice callus showed no GA3 response, which appears with 2,4-D and GA3 in YE-containing medium.

Organ / stage
callus tissuese1
Treatment
chemically defined mediume1
Outcome
GA3 responsee1
Comparator
YE containing mediume1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Callus Tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96
e1

“A chemically defined medium did not reveal the GA3 response, that is a remarkable growth promoting phenomenon in callus tissues by the interaction of 2, 4-dichrolophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) and GA3 in the YE containing medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–650

Title

Amino Acids as Complementary Factors for the Growth and Redifferentiation of Rice Callus Tissues

Hitoshi SAKA; Eizo MAEDA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1972. doi:10.1626/jcs.41.15

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e8729d39fb50863602f227b8c8b3afd775b42591bfc6139d957b02c6611d571a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

in vitro · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.