Intervention effectmodel-written summary

EBW-4 drench increased shoot growth for four years.

A claim from Promotion of apple tree growth and fruit production by the EBW-4 strain of Bacillus subtilis in apple replant disease soil · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBW-4 drench increased shoot growth for four years.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Treatment
postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total shoot growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
for 4 yearse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The postplanting drench application of strain EBW-4 of Bacillus subtilis alone was consistently effective in increasing cross-sectional trunk area for 5 years, total shoot growth for 4 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–532
e7

“McIntosh apple trees on M.26 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340

Title

Promotion of apple tree growth and fruit production by the EBW-4 strain of Bacillus subtilis in apple replant disease soil

R. S. Utkhede; E. M. Smith Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1992. doi:10.1139/m92-209

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e8ad78d2d61bfa954a6db6001cb599d939c3cbde6dd6fec2cd1e9c7e48dbfea9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 76 positive, 31 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.